Australia: The Constitutional Protection of Political and Governmental Speech as an “Implied Freedom” Essential to Facilitating Democratic Deliberation, the Electoral Process, and Democracy Itself (2024)

Free Speech as Civic Structure: A Comparative Analysis of How Courts and Culture Shape the Freedom of Speech

Ronald J Krotoszynski, Jr.

Published:

2024

Online ISBN:

9780197662229

Print ISBN:

9780197662199

Contents

  • < Previous chapter
  • Next chapter >

Free Speech as Civic Structure: A Comparative Analysis of How Courts and Culture Shape the Freedom of Speech

Ronald J Krotoszynski, Jr.

Chapter

Get access

Ronald J Krotoszynski, Jr.

Pages

103–134

  • Published:

    May 2024

Cite

Krotoszynski, Jr., Ronald J, 'Australia: The Constitutional Protection of Political and Governmental Speech as an “Implied Freedom” Essential to Facilitating Democratic Deliberation, the Electoral Process, and Democracy Itself', Free Speech as Civic Structure: A Comparative Analysis of How Courts and Culture Shape the Freedom of Speech (New York, NY, 2024; online edn, Oxford Academic, 28 May 2024), https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197662229.003.0005, accessed 7 June 2024.

Close

Search

Close

Search

Advanced Search

Search Menu

Abstract

Australia provides a compelling example of how the presence or absence of constitutional text need not prefigure whether the domestic courts will exercise a power of judicial review to safeguard expressive freedom. Even though Australia lacks a constitutional free speech guarantee, in 1992, Australia’s highest judicial tribunal and the institutional equivalent of the Supreme Court of the United States, the High Court of Australia (HCA) has recognized an “implied freedom” of political and governmental communication as a structural necessity in a polity that practices democratic self-government. This jurisprudential innovation demonstrates with convincing clarity that the absence of a constitutional text safeguarding the freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition, and association need not be an insurmountable obstacle to the exercise of judicial review to protect these expressive freedoms. Going forward, the HCA must decide if it actually means what is has been saying since handing down its landmark decision in ATV, in 1992, about the necessary relationship between the freedom of speech (and presumably other expressive freedoms) and the practice of democratic self-government. If expressive freedoms are, in fact, essential to maintaining free and fair elections, then Australia’s implied freedom of political and governmental communication should be expanded and extended to reach any and all communications that help facilitate informed and engaged citizenship by voters and expressly reach any and all forms of expressive activity (including speech, but also including assembly, association, petition, and a free press) that voters seek to utilize. Even if the freedom of speech in Australia is not a personal right, as it is in the United States, Israel, South Africa, and the United Kingdom, a commitment to democracy and democratic discourse requires judicial recognition and protection of all modalities of expressive freedom.

Keywords: Australia, High Court, ATV, implied freedom of speech, Commonwealth Constitution, democratic constitutionalism, voting, elections, speech, legalism

Subject

Law Constitutional and Administrative Law Parliamentary and Legislative Practice Comparative Law Courts and Procedure

Collection: Oxford Scholarship Online

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Sign in

Get help with access

Personal account

  • Sign in with email/username & password
  • Get email alerts
  • Save searches
  • Purchase content
  • Activate your purchase/trial code
  • Add your ORCID iD

Sign in Register

Institutional access

    Sign in through your institution

    Sign in through your institution

  1. Sign in with a library card
  2. Sign in with username/password
  3. Recommend to your librarian

Institutional account management

Sign in as administrator

Get help with access

Institutional access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Sign in through your institution

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

  1. Click Sign in through your institution.
  2. Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
  3. When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  4. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Sign in with a library card

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

  1. Click Sign in through society site.
  2. When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  3. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

Personal account

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

  • View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
  • View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

Institutional account management

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Purchase

Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.

Purchasing information

Metrics

Total Views 0

0 Pageviews

0 PDF Downloads

Since 6/7/2024

Citations

Powered by Dimensions

Altmetrics

×

More from Oxford Academic

Comparative Law

Constitutional and Administrative Law

Courts and Procedure

Law

Legal System and Practice

Parliamentary and Legislative Practice

Books

Journals

Australia: The Constitutional Protection of Political and Governmental Speech as an “Implied Freedom” Essential to Facilitating Democratic Deliberation, the Electoral Process, and Democracy Itself (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated:

Views: 6195

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.