This is what happens when idiotic thought is allowed - dangertim MU
- 7/16 11:45:59
Sparky has been challenging MBS and rask for awhile - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:09:09
yeah....I might get to the point that I'm going to - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:11:50
he's been on ignore for a long time (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:23:29
Yes. I'm sure your bubble is comfortable.for you nm. - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:30:44
yes, it is, thanks (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:37:29
I did notice that their list of millionaires to donate to - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:06:14
did any of them receive covid relief funds? (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:09:22
I doubt it. Did any of those that they choose to list? How - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:11:59
I don't know, which is why I was asking you (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:18:13
So you admit it was a BS question completely unrelated to - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:42:23
no, I asked you a valid question - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:46:45
No you asked a completely random question that had no - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:55:08
random? I don't think that word means what you think it does - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:58:13
pervade (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 11:48:55
british spoelling(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/16 11:53:37
tori spelling (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/16 12:08:51
The Onion is a satire site. Yes, I get your poor attempt at - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:48:11
satire requires an element of truth. This is a good example - dangertim MU - 7/16 11:54:54
I wasn't criticizing the Onion article. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:55:53
that's because you don't understand the point of the - dangertim MU - 7/16 11:58:57
I understand it perfectly. I reject your hypothesis. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:00:17
so, tax cuts to corporations means the govt gives - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:01:52
Who else would the $$$ go to? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:06:46
lol wtf are you talking about - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:13:39
Whose financial position is improved by eliminating an - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:16:59
you said that the government is giving them money, you - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:20:29
Who is removing the obligation? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:22:42
taking less money is not giving people money. - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:34:22
My thinking is what an accountant would think auditing - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:50:42
It's coming from a guy who states that we have little - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:42:25
We do have very little good governance right now. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:51:37
Below you didn't qualify it with "good". (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/16 13:02:01
Innocent omission. I think faster than I type. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 13:09:38
so if you were stealing $100 from me every week and - 90Tiger STL - 7/16 12:34:17
Irrelevant. Taxes are not legal theft. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:54:19
military, government agencies, etc - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:08:51
So if a corporation's obligation is reduced, how does that - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:13:24
so reducing an obligation = giving them money? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:23:08
Who reduced the obligation? If you owe dangertim - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:26:30
oh dear. - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:35:48
Yes. Please remember that when you post stupid shyte - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:55:07
example?(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/16 13:04:49
lol wait what? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:33:23
Both are legal debts. Some of you should learn basic - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 13:00:11
if he owes dangertim $50 - ashtray UF - 7/16 12:30:12
That's where your argument falls apart. You are - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:35:21
It 100% changes the "nature" of the obligation. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:36:03
No, it doesn't. The obligation is legal whether you object - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:59:16
You said two things it does not change: - ummmm MU - 7/16 13:01:41
I actually laughed when I read it - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:34:20
By his reasoning if I carjack you but allow you to get your - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/16 12:45:34
lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/16 12:48:46
It is somewhat relevant to the Onion article, in that you - ummmm MU - 7/16 11:53:14
It is also similar in that both the article and my post - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 11:58:58
We're not talking about the decently wealthy guy - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:04:52
I'm not for big government. Honestly, we have very little - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:09:00
Yes, you are. And yes, we do. We're at a moment - ummmm MU - 7/16 12:30:50
Yes, there is bad governance. I will grant that. There is - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:56:52
if less burdens="favoring" to you, then - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:01:02
Fewer burdens is favorable, yes. That is obvious. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:24:22
And the only way to achieve that is your party taking over. - hefeweizen MU - 7/16 12:00:13
I don't have a party. Yes, I tend to favor Democrats because - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:05:30
so...dems fall short b/c they fail to be full socialists - dangertim MU - 7/16 12:07:42
I've never advocated for full government ownership of - SparkyStalcup MU - 7/16 12:19:39
You live in MO?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 7/16 12:06:05
Fair share(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 7/16 11:54:46
